Woodstock Candy Posting Page
Monday, September 26, 2011
Chuckles candy is one of those old time candies that you either love or hate. It's been around since 1921, and according to my math, that's 90 years! That's a long time for a simple jelly candy to survive. Farley's and Sathers has been the owner since 2002, and they're still making them like I remember from when my grandma used to buy them for a nickel. Still the same flavors: licorice, lemon, orange, cherry, and lime. Even the packaging hasn't changed much. I never bought Chuckles candy when I was a kid, but I've grown to appreciate them now. It's a candy that appeals to an older crowd, although my nineteen year old daughter absolutely loves them! At Woodstock Candy, we put a pack of Chuckles candy in most of our retro candy boxes, because we know you will have encountered them somewhere during your childhood. Even if you didn't eat them as a kid, chances are that your parents did. Each pack contains five individual pieces, neatly aligned in a row. They're coated in sugar, and aren't overly sweet. You can make them last a long time, and they don't get sticky and they won't melt. A lot of New Yorkers who have moved to Florida say they are hard to find there. But here in New York, they're easy to find; probably because we love them so much!
by: Woodstock Candy
- Enjoy Fall from Woodstock Candy
- B.B. King and More... September Birthdays!
- Jennifer Hudson Celebrates 30th Birthday
- Nostagic Cars and Nostalgic Candy Songs
- Ohhh Noooo!! SNL Mr. Bill
- Historical Milestones in Candy History
- Buddy Holly Would Have Celebrated 75th Birthday
- Bubble Gum Cigarettes that Smoke
- Necco Wafers Retro Candy
- Candy for Gifts
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
- June 2008
- July 2008
- August 2008
- September 2008
- October 2008
- November 2008
- December 2008
- January 2009
- February 2009
- March 2009
- April 2009
- May 2009
- June 2009
- July 2009
- August 2009
- September 2009
- October 2009
- November 2009
- December 2009
- January 2010
- April 2010
- May 2010
- June 2010
- July 2010
- August 2010
- September 2010
- October 2010
- November 2010
- December 2010
- January 2011
- February 2011
- March 2011
- April 2011
- May 2011
- June 2011
- July 2011
- August 2011
- September 2011
- October 2011
- November 2011
- December 2011
- January 2012
- February 2012
- March 2012
- April 2012
- May 2012
- June 2012
- July 2012
- August 2012
- September 2012
- October 2012
- November 2012
- December 2012
- January 2013
- February 2013
- March 2013
- April 2013
- May 2013
- June 2013
- July 2013
- August 2013
- September 2013
- October 2013
- November 2013
- December 2013
- January 2014
Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]
View mobile version
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]