Woodstock Candy Posting Page
Thursday, May 8, 2008
By GREG BLUESTEIN Associated Press
ATLANTA — Selling marijuana-flavored candy to children will net the seller a $500 fine under a ban that may be the first of its kind in the nation.
Gov. Sonny Perdue signed a law Wednesday banning the sale of “marijuana flavored products” to minors. It slaps violators with a misdemeanor and imposes a fine of up to $500 for each offense.
The law, which takes effect July 1, targets businesses that sell candies with drug-inspired names such as “Kronic Kandy” and “Pot Suckers.” Those candies, the measure says, give children the “false impression that marijuana is fun and safe.”
Vote Hemp, a national organization that promotes the use of hemp products and tracks legislation, says the law would make Georgia the first state to ban the sale of the candy to minors.Marketers argue that the pot-flavored sweets are a harmless novelty and say they advise retailers to sell the stuff only to customers 18 or older. They say the candies are flavored with hemp essential oil, a legal product that gives them the taste of marijuana but doesn’t make the user intoxicated.
Tom Murphy, Vote Hemp’s national outreach coordinator, called the Georgia measure flawed and warned it could damage the “legitimate and legal hemp food industry.”
“This law may unintentionally ban hemp foods and other hemp products in Georgia as well,” said Murphy. He added that the law could also apply to hemp foods such as hemp milk, hemp granola and even cosmetics such as lip balm made with hemp.
The measure warns in a preamble that marijuana flavored candy may serve as a “gateway” to use of marijuana and other illegal drugs, and asserts that merchants selling the candy are “creating new customers for drug dealers.”
“The sale of marijuana flavored products, including lollipops and gum drops, which claim ‘every lick is like taking a hit’ is a marketing ploy that perpetuates an unhealthy culture and should not be permitted in the state of Georgia,” it reads.
Backers of the bill also warned that some dealers were luring children by selling them pieces of the candy.
One of the sponsors, state Rep. Judy Manning, R-Marietta, told lawmakers, “They’re selling for $4 to $8 apiece. It’s quite expensive and it’s quite detrimental to our children.”
A handful of communities have enacted similar bans.
New Jersey lawmakers passed a resolution in 2005 urging the state attorney general to investigate the issue, according to Vote Hemp. The sale of marijuana-flavored candies has also been outlawed in Chicago, Suffolk County, N.Y., Schaumburg, Ill., and parts of Alameda County, Calif.
Perdue’s signature marked the end of a three-year effort in Georgia to target marijuana-flavored candy.A similar measure passed the House last year but never reached a vote in the Senate. And a 2006 effort that would have banned all sales of the candy and threatened repeat offenders with prison time never reached a vote.
http://news.jacksonville.com/justin/2008/05/07/georgia-bans-sale-of-pot-flavored-candy-to-kids/
by: Woodstock Candy
ATLANTA — Selling marijuana-flavored candy to children will net the seller a $500 fine under a ban that may be the first of its kind in the nation.
Gov. Sonny Perdue signed a law Wednesday banning the sale of “marijuana flavored products” to minors. It slaps violators with a misdemeanor and imposes a fine of up to $500 for each offense.
The law, which takes effect July 1, targets businesses that sell candies with drug-inspired names such as “Kronic Kandy” and “Pot Suckers.” Those candies, the measure says, give children the “false impression that marijuana is fun and safe.”
Vote Hemp, a national organization that promotes the use of hemp products and tracks legislation, says the law would make Georgia the first state to ban the sale of the candy to minors.Marketers argue that the pot-flavored sweets are a harmless novelty and say they advise retailers to sell the stuff only to customers 18 or older. They say the candies are flavored with hemp essential oil, a legal product that gives them the taste of marijuana but doesn’t make the user intoxicated.
Tom Murphy, Vote Hemp’s national outreach coordinator, called the Georgia measure flawed and warned it could damage the “legitimate and legal hemp food industry.”
“This law may unintentionally ban hemp foods and other hemp products in Georgia as well,” said Murphy. He added that the law could also apply to hemp foods such as hemp milk, hemp granola and even cosmetics such as lip balm made with hemp.
The measure warns in a preamble that marijuana flavored candy may serve as a “gateway” to use of marijuana and other illegal drugs, and asserts that merchants selling the candy are “creating new customers for drug dealers.”
“The sale of marijuana flavored products, including lollipops and gum drops, which claim ‘every lick is like taking a hit’ is a marketing ploy that perpetuates an unhealthy culture and should not be permitted in the state of Georgia,” it reads.
Backers of the bill also warned that some dealers were luring children by selling them pieces of the candy.
One of the sponsors, state Rep. Judy Manning, R-Marietta, told lawmakers, “They’re selling for $4 to $8 apiece. It’s quite expensive and it’s quite detrimental to our children.”
A handful of communities have enacted similar bans.
New Jersey lawmakers passed a resolution in 2005 urging the state attorney general to investigate the issue, according to Vote Hemp. The sale of marijuana-flavored candies has also been outlawed in Chicago, Suffolk County, N.Y., Schaumburg, Ill., and parts of Alameda County, Calif.
Perdue’s signature marked the end of a three-year effort in Georgia to target marijuana-flavored candy.A similar measure passed the House last year but never reached a vote in the Senate. And a 2006 effort that would have banned all sales of the candy and threatened repeat offenders with prison time never reached a vote.
http://news.jacksonville.com/justin/2008/05/07/georgia-bans-sale-of-pot-flavored-candy-to-kids/
by: Woodstock Candy
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
- June 2008
- July 2008
- August 2008
- September 2008
- October 2008
- November 2008
- December 2008
- January 2009
- February 2009
- March 2009
- April 2009
- May 2009
- June 2009
- July 2009
- August 2009
- September 2009
- October 2009
- November 2009
- December 2009
- January 2010
- April 2010
- May 2010
- June 2010
- July 2010
- August 2010
- September 2010
- October 2010
- November 2010
- December 2010
- January 2011
- February 2011
- March 2011
- April 2011
- May 2011
- June 2011
- July 2011
- August 2011
- September 2011
- October 2011
- November 2011
- December 2011
- January 2012
- February 2012
- March 2012
- April 2012
- May 2012
- June 2012
- July 2012
- August 2012
- September 2012
- October 2012
- November 2012
- December 2012
- January 2013
- February 2013
- March 2013
- April 2013
- May 2013
- June 2013
- July 2013
- August 2013
- September 2013
- October 2013
- November 2013
- December 2013
- January 2014
Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]