Woodstock Candy Posting Page
Thursday, May 22, 2008
Is candy rule really needed?
Philip Wolf, The Daily News (Nanaimo) Published: Thursday, May 22, 2008
What's the best part of any parade?
The impressive floats? The marching bands? The wacky costumes on the service club members? The cheesy politicians doing the "screwing in the lightbulb" wave?
If you're a kid, the answer is easy: The candy.
You're not sitting there for an hour or three in the blazing sunshine without the potential for some sort of reward.
The time-honoured tradition of the mad scramble for a stale Dubble Bubble (circa 1977) keeps the adrenaline flowing.
The thought of getting that treasured balloon from Johnny's Teacup Warehouse . . . magic.
At Nanaimo's annual Empire Days parade on Sunday, it was a dentist's delight - nary a candy in sight.
In fact, hardly a giveaway at all. The odd deck of cards from the casino float, a few mascot masks from a financial institution and that's about it.
Where's the fun in that, you ask?
Well, several of you did, so I went about finding the answer, and it's a simple one.
Ron Lillie doesn't want any dead bodies.
Lillie, chairman of the Empire Days parade, said the process of doling out the candy is simply too dangerous.
He said if the candy is tossed too close to the wheels of a moving vehicle "babies suddenly see it and dive for it."
He said he has personally witnessed several close calls.
"It's strictly a safety issue," he said.
Personally, I don't see a problem with the tossing of candy from the floats, even in Nanaimo.
Most kids understand the merits of not running in front of a moving vehicle.
Most folks on a float understand the merits of tossing the candies far from the vehicles (which aren't exactly moving like the Mach 5 either).
"It's OK in Victoria, where there's a long distance (between the floats and the crowd)," said Lillie. "In Nanaimo, the streets are just too narrow."
Now, before we categorize the Nanaimo organizers as overzealous fun police, accidents happen.
A nine-year-old boy was killed last year at a Christmas parade in Plant City, Fla., run over as he reached for a wayward sweet tossed from a float.
Other parades throughout North America also have rules against tossing candy.
Lillie said marshals will often turn a blind eye to giveaways (still technically not allowed) if they involve people walking to the curbs to safely hand out the goodies.
It would be easy to argue that sends a mixed message. What happens if little Jenny decides that she wants a balloon animal from Chuckles the Clown (who was handing them out safely) and starts chasing him down the road, only to get clipped by the Precision Pogo Stick Squad?
A lot of it seems to bring to mind your granny waving her finger at you and warning that "someone's going to lose an eye."
Are organizers being overprotective or unnecessarily cautious?
Or are they simply being prudent, since any accident is one too many?
Interesting call. Choosing to err on the side of caution isn't a bad strategy in this case.
Either way, the parade is always a good time (for geezers like me anyway) and a credit to the hard work of the organizers and the participants.
But it would be a lot better if they figured out a way to allow more goodies.
Right kids?
Philip Wolf's column runs regularly in this space. If you would like to comment on his opinion, send your letter to letters@
nanaimodailynews.com
http://www.canada.com/nanaimodailynews/story.html?id=3b9099f4-b8d0-4806-9e1b-df58b0896867
by: Woodstock Candy
Philip Wolf, The Daily News (Nanaimo) Published: Thursday, May 22, 2008
What's the best part of any parade?
The impressive floats? The marching bands? The wacky costumes on the service club members? The cheesy politicians doing the "screwing in the lightbulb" wave?
If you're a kid, the answer is easy: The candy.
You're not sitting there for an hour or three in the blazing sunshine without the potential for some sort of reward.
The time-honoured tradition of the mad scramble for a stale Dubble Bubble (circa 1977) keeps the adrenaline flowing.
The thought of getting that treasured balloon from Johnny's Teacup Warehouse . . . magic.
At Nanaimo's annual Empire Days parade on Sunday, it was a dentist's delight - nary a candy in sight.
In fact, hardly a giveaway at all. The odd deck of cards from the casino float, a few mascot masks from a financial institution and that's about it.
Where's the fun in that, you ask?
Well, several of you did, so I went about finding the answer, and it's a simple one.
Ron Lillie doesn't want any dead bodies.
Lillie, chairman of the Empire Days parade, said the process of doling out the candy is simply too dangerous.
He said if the candy is tossed too close to the wheels of a moving vehicle "babies suddenly see it and dive for it."
He said he has personally witnessed several close calls.
"It's strictly a safety issue," he said.
Personally, I don't see a problem with the tossing of candy from the floats, even in Nanaimo.
Most kids understand the merits of not running in front of a moving vehicle.
Most folks on a float understand the merits of tossing the candies far from the vehicles (which aren't exactly moving like the Mach 5 either).
"It's OK in Victoria, where there's a long distance (between the floats and the crowd)," said Lillie. "In Nanaimo, the streets are just too narrow."
Now, before we categorize the Nanaimo organizers as overzealous fun police, accidents happen.
A nine-year-old boy was killed last year at a Christmas parade in Plant City, Fla., run over as he reached for a wayward sweet tossed from a float.
Other parades throughout North America also have rules against tossing candy.
Lillie said marshals will often turn a blind eye to giveaways (still technically not allowed) if they involve people walking to the curbs to safely hand out the goodies.
It would be easy to argue that sends a mixed message. What happens if little Jenny decides that she wants a balloon animal from Chuckles the Clown (who was handing them out safely) and starts chasing him down the road, only to get clipped by the Precision Pogo Stick Squad?
A lot of it seems to bring to mind your granny waving her finger at you and warning that "someone's going to lose an eye."
Are organizers being overprotective or unnecessarily cautious?
Or are they simply being prudent, since any accident is one too many?
Interesting call. Choosing to err on the side of caution isn't a bad strategy in this case.
Either way, the parade is always a good time (for geezers like me anyway) and a credit to the hard work of the organizers and the participants.
But it would be a lot better if they figured out a way to allow more goodies.
Right kids?
Philip Wolf's column runs regularly in this space. If you would like to comment on his opinion, send your letter to letters@
nanaimodailynews.com
http://www.canada.com/nanaimodailynews/story.html?id=3b9099f4-b8d0-4806-9e1b-df58b0896867
by: Woodstock Candy
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
- June 2008
- July 2008
- August 2008
- September 2008
- October 2008
- November 2008
- December 2008
- January 2009
- February 2009
- March 2009
- April 2009
- May 2009
- June 2009
- July 2009
- August 2009
- September 2009
- October 2009
- November 2009
- December 2009
- January 2010
- April 2010
- May 2010
- June 2010
- July 2010
- August 2010
- September 2010
- October 2010
- November 2010
- December 2010
- January 2011
- February 2011
- March 2011
- April 2011
- May 2011
- June 2011
- July 2011
- August 2011
- September 2011
- October 2011
- November 2011
- December 2011
- January 2012
- February 2012
- March 2012
- April 2012
- May 2012
- June 2012
- July 2012
- August 2012
- September 2012
- October 2012
- November 2012
- December 2012
- January 2013
- February 2013
- March 2013
- April 2013
- May 2013
- June 2013
- July 2013
- August 2013
- September 2013
- October 2013
- November 2013
- December 2013
- January 2014
Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]